Gillian Frost'un (Avukatl\u0131k Departman\u0131) san\u0131klardan birini temsil etmek \u00fczere g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fi ve beraatla sonu\u00e7lanan yak\u0131n tarihli \u00f6nemli bir cinayet davas\u0131nda, davan\u0131n en yeni y\u00f6nlerinden biri, m\u00fcvekkiline yard\u0131mc\u0131 olmak i\u00e7in bir arac\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131yd\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
S\u00f6z konusu daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemli \u00f6\u011frenme g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fckleri vard\u0131 ve davay\u0131 anlamas\u0131na ve takip etmesine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olacak \u00f6zel destek olmaks\u0131z\u0131n haks\u0131z bir dezavantaja maruz kalma riski b\u00fcy\u00fckt\u00fc. Bu destek i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve kabul edilmi\u015ftir. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki makalede Gillian bu geli\u015fmekte olan alan\u0131n yasal arka plan\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
1999 tarihli Gen\u00e7lik Adaleti ve Cezai Kan\u0131t Yasas\u0131'n\u0131n (Yasa) 16(1) maddesi, savunmas\u0131z ve korkutulmu\u015f tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifade vermelerini kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmak i\u00e7in \u00f6zel tedbirlerin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bu Kanunun 29. B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, bir tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir arac\u0131 vas\u0131tas\u0131yla sorgulanmas\u0131na izin veren \u00f6zel tedbirlerden biridir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Daval\u0131lar i\u00e7in \u00f6zel tedbirlerin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 Kanunun 16(1) maddesi ile a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a hari\u00e7 tutulmu\u015ftur. Ancak, 2009 tarihli Sorgu Yarg\u0131\u00e7lar\u0131 ve Adalet Yasas\u0131 s.104 ile eklenen bir de\u011fi\u015fiklikle Yasa'ya s.33BA eklenmi\u015ftir. S.104'\u00fcn bir k\u0131sm\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yeniden \u00fcretilmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
B\u00f6l\u00fcm 33BA San\u0131\u011f\u0131n arac\u0131 vas\u0131tas\u0131yla sorgulanmas\u0131<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(1) Bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm, bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 bir ki\u015fi aleyhine (ister sulh mahkemesinde ister Kraliyet Mahkemesi'nde) a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(2) Mahkeme, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki hususlarda tatmin olmas\u0131 halinde (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca bir talimat verebilir<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n(a) san\u0131kla ilgili olarak alt b\u00f6l\u00fcm (5)'teki ko\u015fulun veya duruma g\u00f6re alt b\u00f6l\u00fcm (6)'daki ko\u015fullar\u0131n yerine getirildi\u011fini ve<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
\n(b) san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adil bir \u015fekilde yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in talimat\u0131n verilmesinin gerekli olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
(3) Bu alt b\u00f6l\u00fcm kapsam\u0131ndaki bir talimat, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n muayenesinin bir terc\u00fcman veya bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan onaylanan ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fi (\u201cbir arac\u0131\u201d) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren bir talimatt\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(4) Bir arac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flevi ileti\u015fim kurmakt\u0131r -<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n(a) san\u0131\u011fa, san\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6neltilen sorular ve<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
\n(b) bu t\u00fcr sorular soran herhangi bir ki\u015fiye, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu sorulara verdi\u011fi cevaplar,<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
ve s\u00f6z konusu sorular\u0131n veya cevaplar\u0131n san\u0131k veya ilgili ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in gerekli oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde a\u00e7\u0131klamak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(5) Ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 18 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olmas\u0131 halinde ko\u015ful, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemede s\u00f6zl\u00fc ifade veren bir tan\u0131k olarak yarg\u0131lamalara etkin bir \u015fekilde kat\u0131lma yetene\u011finin, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n zihinsel yetenek veya sosyal i\u015flev d\u00fczeyi nedeniyle tehlikeye girmesidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(6) San\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte 18 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurmu\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki ko\u015fullar aran\u0131r<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n(a) san\u0131\u011f\u0131n (1983 tarihli Ak\u0131l Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Yasas\u0131 anlam\u0131nda) bir ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan muzdarip olmas\u0131 veya ba\u015fka bir \u015fekilde zeka ve sosyal i\u015flevlerinde \u00f6nemli bir bozulma olmas\u0131 ve<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
\n(b) san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu nedenle mahkemede s\u00f6zl\u00fc ifade veren bir tan\u0131k olarak yarg\u0131lamalara etkin bir \u015fekilde kat\u0131lamamas\u0131.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
(7) San\u0131\u011f\u0131n (3). f\u0131kra kapsam\u0131ndaki bir talimata uygun olarak yap\u0131lacak herhangi bir sorgusu, Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kurallar\u0131n\u0131n veya talimat\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ki\u015filerin huzurunda ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki ko\u015fullarda yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n(a) yarg\u0131c\u0131n veya yarg\u0131\u00e7lar\u0131n (veya her ikisinin) ve yarg\u0131lamada g\u00f6rev alan yasal temsilcilerin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunu g\u00f6rebilmeleri ve duyabilmeleri ve arac\u0131 ile ileti\u015fim kurabilmeleri ve<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
\n(b) j\u00fcrinin (e\u011fer varsa) san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunu g\u00f6rebilmesi ve duyabilmesi ve<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
\n(c) yarg\u0131lamada iki veya daha fazla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 halinde, di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n her biri san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunu g\u00f6rebilecek ve duyabilecektir.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
Bu alt b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda, herhangi bir g\u00f6rme veya i\u015fitme bozuklu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131nmayacakt\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ne yaz\u0131k ki bu de\u011fi\u015fiklik hen\u00fcz y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmemi\u015ftir ve halen \u00f6nemli miktarda haz\u0131rl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden s.104 i\u00e7in bir uygulama tarihinin hen\u00fcz verilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\nBununla birlikte, C \/ Sevenoaks Gen\u00e7lik Mahkemesi - EWHC 3088 (3\/11\/09) davas\u0131 temelinde bir ba\u015fvuru ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olabilir, burada bir \u00e7ocuk San\u0131k ad\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla ilgili bir ba\u015fvuru kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Dava, Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme'de adli inceleme ba\u015fvurusu i\u00e7in izin ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Openshaw J'nin karar\u0131n\u0131n 16. Paragraf\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cBir San\u0131k i\u00e7in arac\u0131 atanmas\u0131na izin veren yasal bir yetki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 daha \u00f6nce a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmi\u015ftim, ancak Ceza Muhakemesi Kurallar\u0131nda usule ili\u015fkin baz\u0131 yetkiler olabilir. Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kurallar\u0131 1.11, ceza davalar\u0131n\u0131n adil bir \u015fekilde ele al\u0131nmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temel amac\u0131 ortaya koymaktad\u0131r ve bu ama\u00e7, (c) bendinde, \u00f6zellikle Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi'nin 6. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda, bir San\u0131\u011f\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7ermektedir. Ayr\u0131ca, mahkemenin r 3.10(b)(v)\u201ddeki dava y\u00f6netimi yetkileri, mahkemenin San\u0131k da dahil olmak \u00fczere herhangi bir ki\u015finin duru\u015fmaya kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmak i\u00e7in gerekli d\u00fczenlemeleri dikkate almas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. Uygun bir davada, bu kesinlikle San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisi i\u00e7in bir arac\u0131 atanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bizim Davam\u0131z<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
B\u00fcy\u00fck bir davada san\u0131k arac\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ilk kez kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na inand\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z davada bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131 temsil ettik. Bu, bir Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme Yarg\u0131c\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fclen bir cinayet davas\u0131yd\u0131. Dava ayn\u0131 zamanda adam ka\u00e7\u0131rma, sahte hapis ve adaletin ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 sapt\u0131rma su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7eriyordu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bu alt\u0131 san\u0131kl\u0131 bir davayd\u0131. Be\u015finci San\u0131k, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da detaylar\u0131n\u0131 verece\u011fimiz s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 yeteneklere sahip (ancak 63 IQ'ya sahip) m\u00fcvekkilimizdi. Arac\u0131, kendisiyle ilgili kan\u0131tlar boyunca San\u0131kla birlikte san\u0131k sandalyesinde oturdu ve ifade verirken onunla birlikte tan\u0131k sandalyesine gitti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Duru\u015fma, Savunmalar\u0131n \u201cbo\u011faz bo\u011faza\u201d do\u011fas\u0131 nedeniyle karma\u015f\u0131kt\u0131 ve ortak san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan bir Arac\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir sorun ortaya at\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Pratik Ad\u0131mlar<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
(1) SAVUNMA TARAFINDAN YAPILAN ILK DE\u011eERLENDIRME<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bizim davam\u0131zda, 36 ya\u015f\u0131nda bir erkek olan San\u0131k, ilk iki m\u00fclakat\u0131nda temsil edilmemi\u015f ve kendisine bir arac\u0131 sa\u011flanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (FME (polis doktoru), San\u0131\u011f\u0131n IQ'sunun \u00e7ok d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011funu bilseydi bir arac\u0131 tavsiye edece\u011fini kan\u0131t olarak kabul etmi\u015ftir).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu polis sorgular\u0131nda verdi\u011fi cevaplar\u0131 okudu\u011fumuzda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmada kendi ad\u0131na ifade vermekte zorlanabilece\u011fini takdir ettik. G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda haf\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok k\u00f6t\u00fc oldu\u011fundan bahsetti. Kendisiyle tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda savunmas\u0131z ve yava\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyordu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bir psikiyatri raporu ve bir e\u011fitim psikolo\u011fu raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 tavsiye ettik.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(2) RAPORLAR<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Elde etti\u011fimiz raporlar, San\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmaya \u00e7\u0131kabilece\u011fini ancak normal mahkeme \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma prosed\u00fcr\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131nda uygun \u015fekilde ifade verme kapasitesine sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. D\u00fczenli molalara ihtiyac\u0131 olacak ve kendisine son derece k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck paketler halinde bilgi verilmesi gerekecektir. Konsantrasyonu s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olacak ve yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 anlay\u0131p anlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kontrol etmek i\u00e7in molalar gerekecektir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bu davada raporlar \u00f6zellikle bir arac\u0131n\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 tavsiye etmi\u015ftir. Raporlar Kraliyet'e tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(3) BA\u015eVURU<\/p>\n\n\n\nArac\u0131 ba\u015fvurusu h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc kabul edilmesi halinde uygun bir arac\u0131 bulunmal\u0131 ve finansman sa\u011flanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bizim davam\u0131zda Savc\u0131l\u0131k ayr\u0131ca iki t\u0131bbi rapor elde etti. (Duru\u015fmada, Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n psikolo\u011funu savunma tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131k \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc psikolog San\u0131k \u00fczerinde daha kapsaml\u0131 testler yapabilmi\u015fti). San\u0131\u011f\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck seviyede s\u00f6zl\u00fc anlama, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck IQ ve \u00e7ok zay\u0131f k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli haf\u0131zaya sahip oldu\u011fu kabul edildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Savc\u0131l\u0131k, San\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir arac\u0131 kullanmas\u0131na itiraz etmedi. Ancak, avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n sahip olabilecekleri endi\u015feleri dile getirebilmeleri i\u00e7in raporlar\u0131 e\u015f san\u0131klara tebli\u011f etmek zorunda kald\u0131k.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Prensip olarak, duru\u015fma yarg\u0131c\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n ifade vermesi durumunda ve di\u011ferlerinin ifadeleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda kendisine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir arac\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(4) BA\u015eVURUNUN KABUL EDILMESINDEN SONRAKI ADIMLAR<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Onayl\u0131 Arac\u0131lar Sicili, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131'n\u0131n bir Departman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tutulmaktad\u0131r. Uygun bir arac\u0131 bulunmas\u0131na yard\u0131mc\u0131 olurlar. Arac\u0131 ile \u201cm\u00fc\u015fteri\u201d aras\u0131nda bir ili\u015fki kurulabilmesi i\u00e7in bir s\u00fcre irtibat kurulmas\u0131 tavsiye edilir. Bu her zaman uzun bir s\u00fcre olmayabilir, ancak ideal olarak duru\u015fmadan \u00f6nce bir ya da iki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme ile ve Arac\u0131ya en az\u0131ndan davan\u0131n bir \u00d6zeti ve herhangi bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme Delili sa\u011fland\u0131ktan sonra kurulmal\u0131d\u0131r. Arac\u0131dan normal olarak, ko\u015fullara ve mevcut zamana ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131 veya s\u00f6zl\u00fc bir de\u011ferlendirme sunmas\u0131 istenecektir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
San\u0131klar i\u00e7in arac\u0131n\u0131n finansman\u0131, Hukuki Hizmet Komisyonu'na \u00f6n yetki ba\u015fvurusu yoluyla yap\u0131l\u0131r. Arac\u0131lar i\u00e7in \u00fccretlerin sunulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Yetki, duru\u015fma \u00f6ncesi de\u011ferlendirme ve duru\u015fmaya kat\u0131l\u0131m i\u00e7indir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Politika Sorumlusu Jason Connolly, Kay\u0131tl\u0131 Arac\u0131 Uygulama ve Etik Kurallar\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n \u00fccret oranlar\u0131 gibi bilgileri sa\u011flamada bize yard\u0131mc\u0131 oldu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(4) DAVA KONULARI<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 4 konu vard\u0131:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(1) Arabulucunun g\u00f6revini davan\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 en az kesintiye u\u011fratacak \u015fekilde yerine getirebilmesi i\u00e7in \u201cTemel Kurallar\u0131n\u201d belirlenmesi gerekiyordu. Arabulucumuz mahkemeye (j\u00fcrinin yoklu\u011funda) rol\u00fcn\u00fc nas\u0131l g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair baz\u0131 g\u00f6zlemlerde bulundu. Arac\u0131, avukatlara \u00e7ifte olumsuzluklardan ve \u00e7oklu c\u00fcmlelerden ka\u00e7\u0131nmalar\u0131n\u0131 ve k\u0131sa sorular sormaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 tavsiye etti. Arac\u0131, San\u0131\u011f\u0131n ara vermesi gerekti\u011fini Yarg\u0131ca nas\u0131l belirtmesi gerekti\u011fine dair benimsenecek prosed\u00fcr\u00fc tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(2) San\u0131kla birlikte r\u0131ht\u0131mda g\u00f6r\u00fclen \u201cg\u00f6revlinin\u201d i\u015flevine ili\u015fkin olarak j\u00fcriye hangi talimatlar (veya rehberlik) verilmelidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
J\u00fcri arac\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ilk kez haberdar edildi\u011finde, duru\u015fma yarg\u0131c\u0131 giri\u015f niteli\u011finde baz\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmu\u015ftur. Duru\u015fman\u0131n ilerleyen safhalar\u0131nda duru\u015fma hakimi, tan\u0131k k\u00fcrs\u00fcs\u00fcnde san\u0131\u011fa yard\u0131mc\u0131 olan arac\u0131 ile ilgili olarak j\u00fcriye sunulmak \u00fczere \u00f6nerilen bir a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 avukatlara da\u011f\u0131tm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamada psikolo\u011fun bulgular\u0131 ve arac\u0131 \u00f6nerisi yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. J\u00fcriye ayr\u0131ca t\u00fcm taraflar\u0131n bu kan\u0131t\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fi ancak Yarg\u0131c\u0131n adil bir yarg\u0131lama sa\u011flamak zorunda oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle arac\u0131ya izin verdi\u011fi s\u00f6ylendi. J\u00fcriye, avukatlara nas\u0131l soru sormalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fi (\u00f6rne\u011fin \u00e7ifte olumsuzluklardan ka\u00e7\u0131nmalar\u0131) konusunda tavsiyede bulunuldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenmi\u015ftir. J\u00fcriye, arac\u0131n\u0131n, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir soruyu anlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmesi halinde bunu belirtece\u011fi s\u00f6ylenmi\u015ftir. J\u00fcriye, Hakimin bir arac\u0131ya izin verilmesi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki karar\u0131na ve arac\u0131n\u0131n mahkemede bulunmas\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, ilgili konularda kendilerinin karar vermesi gerekti\u011fi s\u00f6ylendi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(3) Arac\u0131ya duyulan ihtiya\u00e7 konusunun hangi a\u015famada ele al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131. Her dava, \u00f6rne\u011fin san\u0131k say\u0131s\u0131na; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifade verip vermeyece\u011fine ya da iddia makam\u0131n\u0131n delilleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131k k\u00fcrs\u00fcs\u00fcnde sadece yard\u0131m al\u0131p almayaca\u011f\u0131na; arac\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fi konusunda mutabakat olup olmamas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak de\u011fi\u015fecektir. Bizim davam\u0131zda arac\u0131ya duyulan ihtiya\u00e7 duru\u015fma \u00f6ncesinde g\u00fcndeme gelmi\u015f ancak esas tart\u0131\u015fma duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda geli\u015fmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131\u00e7, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adil bir \u015fekilde yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla, arac\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k sandalyesinde oturmas\u0131na izin verdi. Arac\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hangi durumlarda anlamakta g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fck \u00e7ekti\u011fini not edebildi\u011fi i\u00e7in bu durum avukata yard\u0131mc\u0131 oldu ve daha sonra kan\u0131tlar\u0131n bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede ona yard\u0131mc\u0131 olabildik. San\u0131k ifade vermeden \u00f6nce (ancak 1'den 4'e kadar olan san\u0131klar ifade verdikten sonra) arac\u0131n\u0131n rol\u00fc avukatlarla daha ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131 ve Yarg\u0131\u00e7 j\u00fcriyi nas\u0131l y\u00f6nlendirece\u011fine karar verdi. \u0130lgin\u00e7 bir \u015fekilde, savunma uzmanlar\u0131m\u0131z daval\u0131n\u0131n ifadesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda araya girmi\u015f ancak Say\u0131n Yarg\u0131\u00e7, daval\u0131 ifadesini vermeden \u00f6nce j\u00fcriye bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Arac\u0131, kelimelerin anlam\u0131n\u0131 netle\u015ftirebilmi\u015f veya ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan konular hakk\u0131nda san\u0131\u011fa g\u00fcvence verebilmi\u015ftir. J\u00fcriye, arac\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k k\u00fcrs\u00fcs\u00fcndeki varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sa bir at\u0131fta bulunulmu\u015ftur. Bizim davam\u0131zda arac\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131 etkilemeyen j\u00fcri se\u00e7imi, a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f konu\u015fmas\u0131 ve ilk tan\u0131klar i\u00e7in haz\u0131r bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(4) Sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde (e\u011fer varsa) ba\u015fka hangi talimatlara ihtiya\u00e7 duyulmu\u015ftur? Duru\u015fma yarg\u0131c\u0131 j\u00fcriye, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n iddia makam\u0131 veya di\u011fer san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan sorulan sorular\u0131 ve kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131 anlamakta g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fck \u00e7ekmesi halinde bir arac\u0131dan yard\u0131m almas\u0131na izin verildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. J\u00fcriye, anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki herhangi bir bozuklu\u011fun boyutunun tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 bir konu oldu\u011fu ve ger\u00e7ekten zorluk ya\u015fay\u0131p ya\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kendileri i\u00e7in bir mesele oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylendi. Zorluklar olmas\u0131 durumunda arac\u0131ya izin verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sonu\u00e7<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade vermeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131p \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmama karar\u0131 bazen zor bir karard\u0131r. Baz\u0131 durumlarda, savunmas\u0131z bir ki\u015fi i\u00e7in t\u0131bbi kan\u0131t, kan\u0131t vermemekten kaynaklanabilecek herhangi bir olumsuz \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131m\u0131 \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in yeterli olabilir. Bununla birlikte, avukat\u0131n deneyiminin, bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekli oldu\u011funa inand\u0131\u011f\u0131 zamanlar da olabilir. Bir arac\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, bir soruyu anlamakta g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fck \u00e7ekti\u011finde m\u00fcdahale edebilecek birinin oldu\u011funu bildi\u011fi i\u00e7in, savunmas\u0131z san\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha rahat hissetmesine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olabilecek bir eylemdir. Arac\u0131, avukata yard\u0131mc\u0131 olur \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc haf\u0131zas\u0131 zay\u0131f olan san\u0131k, davaya bir sonraki ara verildi\u011finde avukata ne s\u00f6ylemesi gerekti\u011fini unutacakt\u0131r. San\u0131k bu durumu hemen arac\u0131ya bildirebilir, o da not alarak avukat\u0131 bilgilendirebilir. Tan\u0131klar i\u00e7in \u00f6zel tedbirler bir s\u00fcredir mevcuttur (savc\u0131l\u0131k ve savunma tan\u0131klar\u0131) ve \u015fimdi en az\u0131ndan savunmas\u0131z san\u0131klar i\u00e7in bu \u00f6zel tedbir mevcuttur. Yukar\u0131da da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, yasal \u00e7er\u00e7eve hen\u00fcz uygulanmamaktad\u0131r. K\u0131smen yeterli say\u0131da kay\u0131tl\u0131 arac\u0131 bulunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken \u00e7ok \u015fey var. Umar\u0131m arac\u0131ya ihtiya\u00e7 duyan t\u00fcm san\u0131klar bir arac\u0131ya sahip olabilirler. M\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan en k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede bu olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n fark\u0131nda olmak \u00f6nemli olacakt\u0131r. \u0130lgili mahkemeye yak\u0131n olan kay\u0131tl\u0131 bir arac\u0131 bulmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak maliyetleri d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmek a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli olacakt\u0131r. Bir arac\u0131 i\u00e7in finansman elde etmek ne kadar uzun zaman al\u0131rsa, yeterince yerel olan uygun bir arac\u0131 bulmak o kadar zor olabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
GILLIAN FROST (Barrister, Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gillian Frost taraf\u0131ndan kaleme al\u0131nan benzer bir makale Criminal Bar Quarterly dergisinde yay\u0131nlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(L\u00fctfen dikkat: Bu makale ilk olarak \u00f6nceki web sitemizde yay\u0131nlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve sadece genel bilgilendirme ama\u00e7l\u0131d\u0131r. Yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki yasal durumu yans\u0131tmakla birlikte, yasa yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu yana de\u011fi\u015fmi\u015f olabilir. Durumunuza uygun g\u00fcncel tavsiyeler i\u00e7in l\u00fctfen ekibimizle ileti\u015fime ge\u00e7in).<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9300","knowledge-base","type-knowledge-base","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\n
The Use of Intermediaries for Defendants - RFB Legal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/bilgi-tabani\/saniklar-icin-aracilarin-kullanilmasi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Use of Intermediaries for Defendants - RFB Legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a notable recent Murder trial in which Gillian Frost (Advocacy Department) was instructed to represent one of the defendants, a trial which resulted in an acquittal, one of the more novel aspects of the case was the use of an intermediary to assist her client. The defendant in question had significant learning difficulties and … Continued\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/bilgi-tabani\/saniklar-icin-aracilarin-kullanilmasi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"RFB Legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RFBLegal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-21T12:25:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"11 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/\",\"name\":\"The Use of Intermediaries for Defendants - RFB Legal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T12:25:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-21T12:25:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Knowledge base\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"The Use of Intermediaries for Defendants\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/\",\"name\":\"RFB Legal\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#organization\",\"name\":\"RFB Legal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/header_company_logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/header_company_logo.svg\",\"caption\":\"RFB Legal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RFBLegal\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/uas\/login?session_redirect=company2012282\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rfb_legal\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Daval\u0131lar i\u00e7in Arac\u0131lar\u0131n Kullan\u0131m\u0131 - RFB Legal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/bilgi-tabani\/saniklar-icin-aracilarin-kullanilmasi\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Use of Intermediaries for Defendants - RFB Legal","og_description":"In a notable recent Murder trial in which Gillian Frost (Advocacy Department) was instructed to represent one of the defendants, a trial which resulted in an acquittal, one of the more novel aspects of the case was the use of an intermediary to assist her client. The defendant in question had significant learning difficulties and … Continued","og_url":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/bilgi-tabani\/saniklar-icin-aracilarin-kullanilmasi\/","og_site_name":"RFB Legal","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RFBLegal\/","article_modified_time":"2026-04-21T12:25:38+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"11 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/","url":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/","name":"Daval\u0131lar i\u00e7in Arac\u0131lar\u0131n Kullan\u0131m\u0131 - RFB Legal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T12:25:36+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-21T12:25:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/the-use-of-intermediaries-for-defendants\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Knowledge base","item":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/knowledge-base\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The Use of Intermediaries for Defendants"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/","name":"RFB Hukuk","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#organization","name":"RFB Hukuk","url":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/header_company_logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/header_company_logo.svg","caption":"RFB Legal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RFBLegal\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/uas\/login?session_redirect=company2012282","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rfb_legal\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/knowledge-base\/9300","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/knowledge-base"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/knowledge-base"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/knowledge-base\/9300\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9307,"href":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/knowledge-base\/9300\/revisions\/9307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9300"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9300"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}