{"id":9934,"date":"2026-07-03T14:16:43","date_gmt":"2026-07-03T14:16:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/?post_type=insight&p=9934"},"modified":"2026-07-07T10:22:37","modified_gmt":"2026-07-07T10:22:37","slug":"ev-sahipligi-kurallarinda-yapilan-degisiklikler-kiralama-hakki-ve-mulkiyet-hakki-reformlarina-iliskin-bir-rehber","status":"publish","type":"insight","link":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/icgoruler\/ev-sahipligi-kurallarinda-yapilan-degisiklikler-kiralama-hakki-ve-mulkiyet-hakki-reformlarina-iliskin-bir-rehber\/","title":{"rendered":"Ev Sahipli\u011finin Kurallar\u0131n\u0131 De\u011fi\u015ftirmek: Kiralama ve M\u00fclkiyet Reformlar\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Bir K\u0131lavuz\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

The rules governing who owns and controls konut<\/a> property in England<\/a> and Wales are undergoing their biggest shake-up in a generation. For decades, buying<\/a> a flat meant entering the complex world of leasehold, a system that often left buyers dealing with rising ground rents, expensive lease<\/a> extensions<\/a>, and disputes with freeholders. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A dual-track legal overhaul\u00a0aims to\u00a0permanently shift\u00a0power away from traditional landlords and give\u00a0it back to homeowners<\/a>. This transition is being driven by two major pieces of legislation,\u00a02024 Kirac\u0131l\u0131k ve M\u00fclkiyet Reformu Kanunu <\/a>ve 2026 Ortak M\u00fclkiyet ve Kirac\u0131l\u0131k Reformu Tasar\u0131s\u0131.\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

2024 Kiralama ve M\u00fclkiyet Reformu Kanunu: Mevcut Durum ve Temyiz Mahkemesi Davas\u0131 <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Leasehold and Serbest M\u00fclk<\/a> Reform Act 2024 became law in May 2024, but its implementation has faced a complex rollout. Freeholders immediately mounted significant legal resistance, arguing that the legislation\u2019s radical structural changes amounted to an unlawful deprivation of property rights under Article 1 of the First Protocol (A1P1) to the European Convention<\/a> on Human Rights (ECHR). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yarg\u0131 Denetimi ve Yakla\u015fan Temyiz Davas\u0131<\/strong> <\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In October 2025, the High Court delivered a comprehensive 167-page judgment dismissing the freeholders’ judicial review claims<\/a>. The court ruled that the government acted within its discretionary powers to correct a systemic, anti-competitive imbalance in the housing<\/a> market. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the legal battle is far from over. On 1 April<\/a> 2026, the Court of \u0130tiraz<\/a> formally granted permission<\/a> to appeal to five major institutional freeholder groups. This second round of high-stakes litigation<\/a> is scheduled to be heard in late 2026 or early 2027. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

M\u00fclk sahiplerinin itiraz\u0131, do\u011frudan 2024 Yasas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 temel unsuruna odaklanmaktad\u0131r: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Evlili\u011fin De\u011ferinin Ortadan Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131:<\/strong>\u00a0The 2024 Act eliminates “marriage value”,\u00a0the hypothetical profit generated when a lease with fewer than 80 years\u00a0remaining\u00a0is extended. Under the old system, this value was split equally between the leaseholder and freeholder. Freeholders argue that removing<\/a> this share\u00a0constitutes\u00a0an uncompensated confiscation of asset value.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
      \n
    1. The Ground Rent Valuation<\/a> Cap:<\/strong>\u00a0Yasa, bir kirac\u0131n\u0131n kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini uzatmak veya m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 sat\u0131n almak i\u00e7in \u00f6demesi gereken primin hesaplanmas\u0131nda, dikkate al\u0131nan arsa kiras\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rla s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rerek, m\u00fclk sahibine \u00f6denecek nihai tutar\u0131 azaltmaktad\u0131r.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
        \n
      1. Hukuki Masraflar\u0131n Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn De\u011fi\u015fimi:<\/strong>\u00a0Historically, leaseholders were contractually bound to pay the freeholder\u2019s professional, valuation, and legal fees during an enfranchisement<\/a> or extension claim. The 2024 Act reverses this, dictating that each party must bear their own costs.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

        Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki H\u00fck\u00fcmler: \u015eu An Hangi H\u00fck\u00fcmler Uygulanabilir?<\/strong> <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

        Unless the Court of Appeal issues a formal injunction<\/a> to stay the legislation, which is highly unlikely, the provisions of the 2024 Act that have already been triggered by commencement orders remain fully active law: <\/p>\n\n\n\n