{"id":3387,"date":"2022-11-24T10:49:42","date_gmt":"2022-11-24T10:49:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/?post_type=insight&p=3387"},"modified":"2025-09-04T16:51:07","modified_gmt":"2025-09-04T16:51:07","slug":"bolum-28-ceza-davalarinda-onceden-kayit-altina-alinmis-deli%cc%87lleri%cc%87n-artan-kullanimi-bolum-2","status":"publish","type":"insight","link":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/tr\/icgoruler\/bolum-28-ceza-davalarinda-onceden-kayit-altina-alinmis-deli%cc%87lleri%cc%87n-artan-kullanimi-bolum-2\/","title":{"rendered":"B\u00f6l\u00fcm 28: Ceza davalar\u0131nda \u00f6nceden kaydedilmi\u015f delillerin artan kullan\u0131m\u0131. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

In his second article about<\/a> the use of pre-recorded video evidence in courts, Piers Desser, Criminal<\/a> Davalar<\/a> Partner at Ronald Fletcher<\/a> Baker, gives further insight<\/a> into the scheme through personal experience and wraps-up with a look to the future.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

My own recent experiences of Section 28 recordings touches upon three important areas for consideration<\/a>. During a multi-defendant case in which a young witness gave pre-recorded evidence \u2013 the first such case to utilise the procedure at the Old Bailey \u2013 the risks of a witness being recalled were highlighted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Davam\u0131zla e\u015f zamanl\u0131 olarak bu tan\u0131k, \u015fiddet ve \u00e7ete ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 konular\u0131n\u0131 ele alan ayr\u0131 bir davaya da dahil olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Findings in that case had the potential to substantially affect the evidence of the witness, primarily going to his bad character, and it is entirely foreseeable that in other similar circumstances a trial could be derailed at short notice causing substantial delays<\/a> and waste of resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B\u00f6l\u00fcm 28'in nihai olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesinden \u00f6nce soru\u015fturman\u0131n uygun \u015fekilde sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 da \u00e7ok \u00f6nemlidir. Ciddi bir cinsel su\u00e7 iddias\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren bir davada CPS, san\u0131k hala polis g\u00f6zetimindeyken, olaydan 24 saatten biraz fazla bir s\u00fcre sonra su\u00e7lama karar\u0131 alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u015eikayet\u00e7inin kan\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n merkezinde telefonundaki kan\u0131tlar yer al\u0131yordu. Erken su\u00e7lama ve sonras\u0131nda yava\u015f ilerleyen soru\u015fturma, tamamen koordinasyonsuz bir \u015fekilde ilerleyen i\u015flemleri ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018A prosecution<\/a> case that was wholly out-of-step\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The prosecution was set upon utilising the Section 28 procedure, to which the Crown Court at Isleworth agreed. However, serious delays in obtaining the phone evidence and practical deficiencies in the police procedure known as Achieving Best Evidence led to a prosecution case that was wholly out-of-step as the complainant\u2019s evidence could not be pre-recorded until the disclosure<\/a> process had been resolved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bu nedenle, duru\u015fmadan k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre \u00f6nce 28. B\u00f6l\u00fcm kayd\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131d\u0131r ve Ceza Adaleti Sisteminin prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn s\u0131k\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesi ve h\u0131z\u0131yla ba\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kmak i\u00e7in yeterli donan\u0131ma sahip olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair daha geni\u015f sorunlar\u0131 g\u00fcndeme getirmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It appears to be the case that Section 28 creates potential difficulty for appellate lawyers. The final version of the recorded evidence is not stored on the digital platform common to all parties, and so cannot be readily accessed by fresh legal representatives who are assisting in an appeal<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A version is retained on a platform operated by Vodafone, but the procedure to obtain retrospective aspect is difficult. Firstly, the court is as yet unsure of its own procedure to grant access and appellant lawyers can find themselves batted back and forth between court and Vodafone to receive the verification details<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eri\u015fim sa\u011fland\u0131ktan sonra, g\u00f6sterilen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin j\u00fcriye sunulan g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerle ayn\u0131 oldu\u011fu her zaman net olmayabilir. Bu durum, duru\u015fmada neler ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 daha iyi anlamak i\u00e7in mahkeme tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n gerekli oldu\u011fu durumlara yol a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

T\u00fcm bu sorunlar, temyiz konular\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczg\u00fcn bir \u015fekilde ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemektedir ve B\u00f6l\u00fcm 28 kan\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren temyiz noktalar\u0131nda \u00f6nemli bir art\u0131\u015f g\u00f6rmeden \u00f6nce ciddi bir \u015fekilde resmile\u015ftirilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Bu t\u00fcr vakalardan kaynaklanan \u00f6nemli i\u015fler var\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the courts see more Section 28 cases the importance<\/a> of funding in this area is brought further into the spotlight. The trial is technically deemed to have started once the recording of cross-examination begins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sonu\u00e7 olarak, Baro hakl\u0131 olarak Adli Yard\u0131m Ajans\u0131n\u0131n, bir davan\u0131n genellikle aylar arayla iki b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne haz\u0131rlanmak ve y\u00fcr\u00fctmek i\u00e7in artan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 kabul etmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bir avukat\u0131n bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, bu t\u00fcr davalardan kaynaklanan \u00f6nemli i\u015fler de vard\u0131r. \u0130dari konular\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, bir ABE'yi i\u00e7eren herhangi bir dava, talimatlar\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131, transkriptlerin kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve di\u011fer kaynaklardan elde edilen kan\u0131tlar\u0131n \u00e7apraz referanslanmas\u0131 gibi dikkatli ve uzun bir s\u00fcreci i\u00e7erir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Duru\u015fman\u0131n aylarca s\u00fcren iki ayr\u0131 zamana yay\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir davan\u0131n haz\u0131rl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olarak delillerin uygun ve gerekli bir \u015fekilde tekrar de\u011ferlendirilmesini gerektirir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because of this, it is my opinion that lawyers should not be funded for, and so expected to have, only one opportunity to consider the primary case documents<\/a>. The legal aid funding scheme for defence solicitors is desperately parlous in any event \u2013 and this true even more so in Section 28 cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When considering the future of the scheme, one can only anticipate that Section 28 will<\/a> encompass more and more cases as the procedure and technology improves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, whilst it is clearly desirable to provide witnesses with the optimum conditions<\/a> in which to give oral testimony it is contrary to the interests of justice to make special measures entirely routine, blunting the efficacy of the examination process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For further information contact<\/a> Piers Desser directly on <\/strong><\/span>020 7613 7138 veya e-posta\u00a0p.desser@rfblegal.co.uk<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3387","insight","type-insight","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t