{"id":3308,"date":"2023-08-08T08:29:27","date_gmt":"2023-08-08T08:29:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/?post_type=insight&p=3308"},"modified":"2024-02-27T13:18:28","modified_gmt":"2024-02-27T13:18:28","slug":"meme-marketing-social-media-manager-sollten-sich-vor-rechtlichen-fallstricken-huten","status":"publish","type":"insight","link":"https:\/\/rfblegal.co.uk\/de\/einblicke\/meme-marketing-social-media-manager-sollten-sich-vor-rechtlichen-fallstricken-huten\/","title":{"rendered":"Meme-Marketing: Social-Media-Manager m\u00fcssen sich vor rechtlichen Fallstricken h\u00fcten"},"content":{"rendered":"

Promoting products or events through social media platforms presents a formidable challenge<\/a>, particularly for social media managers operating within limited budgets. Amidst this challenge, memes emerge as a budget-friendly approach to skilfully communicate messages. Memes have a unique ability to cut through the noise of social media and resonate with people, making them a valuable tool for social media campaigns. Yet, even though memes might seem like mere ‘humorous images’ circulating freely in the digital realm, it’s vital to recognise that Geistiges Eigentum<\/a> laws still apply to them. Grasping the legal ramifications is paramount for social media managers, to safeguard them from potential complications.<\/em> <\/p>\n\n\n\n


Zwei Arten von Memen\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Wenn es darum geht, Memes f\u00fcr die Promotion von Inhalten zu verwenden, gibt es zwei Arten zu beachten: Eigene\/gemeinsame Memes und Memes von Dritten.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eigene\/Freigegebene Memes<\/strong>\u00a0are those created by the marketing department, where they own or share the intellectual Eigenschaft<\/a> (IP) rights to the meme. (e.g., look at the recent Barbie film campaign with Oppenheimer aka\u00a0\u2018Barbenheimer\u2019.\u2019<\/a>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>- obwohl ich davon ausgehe, dass beide Studios sich beteiligen und m\u00f6glicherweise gegenseitige Lizenzen vergeben, um den Hype auszunutzen, da die Kampagnen der beiden Filme unglaublich gut koordiniert sind)\u00a0
\u00a0
Memes von Drittanbietern<\/strong>\u00a0are memes that the marketing department does not own the IP rights to. They tend to be more commonly used because of the social currency they hold (be it an image or video clip) which helps propel<\/a> or colour a message the brand is trying to tell.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0
Die Risiken von Memes von Drittanbietern\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While Third-Party Memes can be effective, they come with potential legal risks, especially when they include copyrighted images or videos without the owner’s permission<\/a> (breach<\/a> of copyright). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a quiet social understanding<\/a> (not a legal one!) that memes co-opted or employed by other brands (as exemplified in dieser Twitter-Beitrag<\/a>) don’t encroach upon or contest the kommerziell<\/a> rights of the intellectual property (IP) owner. Instead, these memes function as custodians of the IP owner’s copyrighted creation within the social fabric. However, the line between acceptable use and infringement is exceedingly delicate. This balance hinges on the intentions behind meme usage and the identities of both the meme users and the IP holders. Understandably, the owners of intellectual property are unlikely to litigate against a 14-year-old sharing a meme on Twitter, especially when compared to pursuing legal action against a business<\/a> worth over \u00a3100M (*Cough* Burnley). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

For absolute clarity, there isn’t a “de minimis” principle that grants free<\/a> rein in using someone else’s IP, suggesting that using even 10 seconds or less of a song or video clip can potentially trigger legal consequences<\/a>. While “Fair Dealing” offers some defence, it must align meticulously with specific exemptions pertaining to using another<\/a> individual’s intellectual property assets. These exemptions, in essence, do not undermine IP owners’ exploitation of their assets or grant third parties the ability to profit from those assets. Hence, the law shows leniency towards certain scenarios, as outlined in s30 and s30A of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. This leniency extends to instances like parody or satire (under s30A), where the use doesn’t compete with the original IP but rather employs it as a reference to convey a distinct point. 
 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Burnley FC und die Meme<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Recently, Burnley FC used memes to announce player transfers in a fun and attention-grabbing way. These posts, while undeniably cringe-worthy, have managed to spark considerable engagement. However, their unconventional approach has also cast a spotlight on potential copyright infringement concerns. The excitement of bringing<\/a> new players is great and follows a recent tradition of cringey\/bad-funny player announcements (*cough* Southampton and Besiktas *cough* but note, these examples fall into the Owned\/Shared Meme category! Burnley sadly does not). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Die erste Stelle,\u00a0\u00fcber den Wechsel von Zeki Amdouni zum Verein<\/a><\/em><\/strong>, hat eine verbl\u00fcffende \u00c4hnlichkeit mit einem Geiselvideo, in dem eine Szene aus den Teletubbies vorkommt. Dieser Beitrag hat beeindruckende 11,4 Millionen Aufrufe (zum Zeitpunkt der Ver\u00f6ffentlichung des Artikels).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00c4hnlich verh\u00e4lt es sich mit dem zweiten Post-Ank\u00fcndigung des Wechsels von James Trafford zum Verein<\/em><\/strong><\/a>-f\u00e4ngt ihn in einer etwas verlegenen Pose ein und nutzt dabei eine Szene aus Zur\u00fcck in die Zukunft. Auch dieser Beitrag war sehr erfolgreich und wurde 1,4 Millionen Mal aufgerufen (Stand: Datum des Artikels).\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n


Potenzielle Verbindlichkeiten\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Der Ernst der Lage wird deutlich, wenn man die beiden Beitr\u00e4ge betrachtet, die Inhalte der Teletubbies (Eigentum der BBC) und von Zur\u00fcck in die Zukunft (Eigentum von Robert Zemeckis und Bob Gale) zeigen. Diese Beitr\u00e4ge verst\u00e4rken strategisch die Pr\u00e4senz von Burnley (gesch\u00e4tzt auf +\u00a3150M<\/a>) as a prominent Premier League team<\/a> across the expansive web landscape. This strategic<\/a> propagation potentially yields indirect commercial advantages<\/a>. Yet, here lies the core issue: Burnley, as a third party, harnesses the intellectual property (IP) belonging to others to communicate a message about<\/a> player acquisitions or self-promotion. To be explicit, this usage constitutes a blatant breach of copyright. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Folglich kann Burnley rechtliche Konsequenzen ziehen, einschlie\u00dflich m\u00f6glicher Schadensersatzzahlungen an die BBC oder an Robert Zemeckis und Bob Gale. Im Zusammenhang mit solchen Konsequenzen w\u00e4re es zwingend erforderlich, den beanstandeten Inhalt unverz\u00fcglich von den Social-Media-Plattformen von Burnley zu entfernen. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Theoretisch besteht die M\u00f6glichkeit, dass Burnley gegen die von Twitter (oder \u201cX\u201d) und Instagram festgelegten Bedingungen versto\u00dfen hat. Durch die Verwendung von geistigem Eigentum auf Plattformen, f\u00fcr die es keine Rechte oder Lizenzen f\u00fcr die Nutzung gibt, besteht das Risiko, dass Burnleys Gesch\u00e4ftskonto als Folge dieser \u00dcbertretungen gesperrt wird. <\/p>\n\n\n\n


Bedeutung der Compliance\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although the chances of account suspension<\/a> and receiving a cease-and-desist letter are slim, the consequences could be severe. Social media managers and marketing managers must exercise caution and obtain proper authorisation before using Third-Party IP in promotional content. In-house counsel’s guidance and client buy-in can also be valuable in avoiding legal complications. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, memes can be a powerful tool for content promotion, but social media managers must tread carefully to avoid legal risks. Unsanctioned use of Third-Party IP can lead to copyright infringement claims<\/a>, potential damages, and even account suspension. Being aware of these risks and obtaining proper permissions is essential for successful and compliant social media campaigns. Additionally, compliance with online advertising regulations and other relevant Regulierung<\/a> considerations (I.e., Premier League\/FA regulations that affect football clubs) is equally vital to ensure a smooth and risk-free promotion of businesses or organisations<\/a>.<\/em> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you require assistance or advice with any of the issues mentioned in this article or any other commercial matters, our dedicated team is ready to Unterst\u00fctzung<\/a> you.<\/em> <\/p>\n\n\n\n


Kontaktieren Sie uns:<\/strong><\/em><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Mansour Mansour<\/strong>: Unternehmen<\/a> & Commercial Solicitor \u2502\u00a0<\/em>M.Mansour@rfblegal.co.uk<\/a>\u00a0\u2502\u00a0020 3995 7798<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zus\u00e4tzliche Informationen<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n